Wage Garnishment for Child Support: CCPA Limits Explained
Reviewed by SupportDecode Editorial Team Page content reviewed Sources Methodology Update log
A federal ceiling over every paycheck
Most child support in the United States is collected by income withholding: the employer deducts support from pay and sends it to the state disbursement unit before the worker sees it. Texas reports that about 80 percent of its collections arrive this way.
The federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. 1673(b), caps how deep that deduction can cut. For support orders the ceiling is 50, 55, 60, or 65 percent of disposable earnings. States may protect more of a paycheck than the federal law does, but never less.
For comparison, ordinary creditor garnishments are capped far lower, at 25 percent of disposable earnings. Support gets the widest channel federal law allows.
Two questions pick your percentage
The federal tier depends on exactly two facts. First: is the worker currently supporting another spouse or dependent child besides those in the order? If yes, the base cap is 50 percent. If no, it is 60 percent.
Second: does the garnishment enforce arrears older than 12 weeks? If yes, add 5 points. So a parent supporting a second family with old arrears can lose up to 55 percent, and a parent with no other dependents and old arrears up to 65 percent.
Florida shows how arrears collection rides these caps in practice: its income deduction orders add 20 percent of the current support amount on top of each payment to retire delinquencies, all still boxed inside the CCPA ceiling.
Disposable earnings is a defined term
The percentages never apply to gross pay. Disposable earnings means pay left after deductions required by law: federal, state, and local taxes, Social Security and Medicare, mandatory state unemployment contributions, and mandatory retirement withholdings.
Voluntary deductions do not reduce disposable earnings. Health insurance premiums, union dues, and 401(k) contributions come out of the worker’s protected share, not off the top. A paycheck can therefore feel far smaller than the 50 percent math suggests, because voluntary deductions and the support withholding stack.
Earnings is read broadly too: wages, salary, commissions, bonuses, and periodic pension payments are all garnishable compensation under the Department of Labor’s guidance, and lump sums can be as well.
The employer’s role is mechanical, not discretionary. Once served with an income withholding order, the employer computes disposable earnings for the pay period, applies the ordered amount up to the governing cap, and remits to the state disbursement unit. Michigan’s statute is explicit that its 50 percent ceiling covers everything support-related combined, so an employer holding a current-support order plus an arrears order does not stack them past the cap.
States that cap below the federal ceiling
Our state rule data shows 13 of the 51 jurisdictions we cover applying a limit below the federal ceiling in at least some support cases: Arizona, California, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia. The table below lists every state, with its rule and source.
Texas caps support withholding at a flat 50 percent of disposable earnings. Michigan caps the total of all support-related withholding, current support, arrears, and fees combined, at 50 percent. California’s default cap for support withholding is also 50 percent.
North Carolina goes lowest for a single order: 40 percent of disposable income, rising to 45 or 50 percent only when multiple orders compete, depending on whether the worker supports other dependents. West Virginia uses 40 or 50 percent, rising to 45 or 55 percent when part of the withholding is for arrears older than 12 weeks.
Some lower limits apply only in certain proceedings. Utah’s 50 percent ceiling covers court writs of garnishment for support judgments, while its agency income withholding can reach the federal maximum. Iowa’s 50 percent applies to a single support withholding; multiple orders can reach the federal tiers.
Most other states adopt the federal 50/55/60/65 matrix, either by referencing the CCPA directly or by mirroring its numbers in state law, as New York does in CPLR 5241.
Each of our garnishment calculators applies the stricter of the federal and state cap for its state and shows which limit is binding on your numbers.
Child support withholding limits by state
All 51 jurisdictions, from the same rule data our state calculators use. 13 apply a limit below the federal ceiling in at least some support cases; the notes say when. Percentages are of disposable earnings, the pay left after taxes and other deductions the law requires.
| State | Maximum withheld for support | When it applies | Legal source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Alabama expressly uses the federal 50%, 55%, 60%, and 65% support-withholding tiers. | Ala. Admin. Code r. 660-3-16-.04 |
| Alaska | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Alaska CSSD generally uses 40% of net disposable earnings, or 50% including ordered health coverage. The percentage may rise for good cause but cannot exceed the federal CCPA ceiling calculated here. | AS 25.27.062; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Arizona | 50% of disposable earnings | Arizona caps support withholding at 50% of disposable income for any pay period, below the 55/60/65% federal CCPA tiers. The arrears add-ons (+25% of the current support if 2-6 months in arrears, +33% if over 6 months, more at 12+ months) are collected WITHIN the 50% ceiling. The Prop 209 ordinary-creditor limit (10% of disposable earnings) does not apply to support orders. | A.R.S. § 25-505.01; § 33-1131(C) |
| Arkansas | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Arkansas withholds current support plus at least 20 percent toward arrears under § 9-14-218, within the federal limits of 50 or 60 percent of disposable earnings, or 55 or 65 percent when the arrearage equals or exceeds 12 weeks of support. | Ark. Code Ann. § 9-14-218; 9 CAR § 5-207; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| California | 50% of disposable earnings | One-half of disposable earnings is exempt: the default maximum withheld for support is 50%. On motion the court may equitably divide earnings, but never above the federal CCPA caps of 15 U.S.C. 1673. | Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 706.052 |
| Colorado | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Colorado support withholding mirrors the federal CCPA tiers under C.R.S. 13-54-104(3)(b): 50% of disposable earnings when the obligor supports another spouse or dependent child, 60% when not, and 5 points more (55%/65%) when arrears are more than 12 weeks old. Ordinary judgment creditors face a far stricter cap: the lesser of 20% of weekly disposable earnings or the excess over 40 times the higher of the federal or Colorado minimum hourly wage, with a hardship reduction available (13-54.5-108/109). For support, "disposable earnings" includes voluntarily deposited tax-deferred compensation, and support-arrears garnishment can reach workers compensation, pensions, and dividends ((1)(b)(II)). A totally and permanently disabled obligor who derives at least 75% of income from disability benefits may object to the withholding amount. | C.R.S. § 13-54-104(3)(b) (support); § 13-54-104(2) (ordinary garnishment) |
| Connecticut | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Connecticut income withholding is bounded by the federal CCPA support ceilings. | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-362; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Delaware | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Delaware support wage attachment remains subject to the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65 percent ceilings. | 13 Del. C. chapter 5; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| District of Columbia | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | District law applies the federal CCPA support-withholding ceiling and prioritizes current support before medical support and arrears. | D.C. Code § 46-251.08; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Florida | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | No stricter Florida cap for support withholding. An additional 20% of the current support obligation is deducted toward delinquencies (61.1301(1)(b)3), always subject to the CCPA maxima. The head-of-family wage exemption (Fla. Stat. 222.11) does not defeat support income deduction. | Fla. Stat. 61.1301(1)(b)4 |
| Georgia | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Income deduction orders direct payors not to withhold in excess of CCPA 303(b) limits; exact subsection not yet confirmed against the official text (official O.C.G.A. is Lexis-only). The 25% cap of O.C.G.A. 18-4-5 governs only non-support garnishment. | O.C.G.A. 19-6-32 |
| Hawaii | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Hawaii income withholding collects current support and an arrears amount, subject to the federal 50%, 55%, 60%, or 65% disposable-earnings ceiling. | HRS § 576D-14; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Idaho | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Support withholding remains subject to the federal CCPA disposable-earnings ceiling. | Idaho Code § 32-1206; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Illinois | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Withholding is capped at the federal CCPA maxima. The stricter 15%-of-gross limit (735 ILCS 5/12-803) applies only to ordinary wage deductions, not support withholding. Exact ILCS subsection for the CCPA cap within 750 ILCS 28/35 not yet confirmed against the official text. | 750 ILCS 28 (Income Withholding for Support Act) |
| Indiana | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Indiana support withholding follows the federal CCPA tiers (50/55/60/65 percent of disposable earnings) through IC 24-4.5-5-105; there is no stricter state cap for support. The 25 percent limit in the same section (reducible to as little as 10 percent on good cause) protects paychecks from ordinary judgment creditors, not from support orders, and a support withholding order has priority over creditor garnishments no matter which was entered first. The official text of IC 24-4.5-5-105 could not be fetched from iga.in.gov and was cross-checked against a reproduction current as of 2026-01-01: not yet confirmed against the official text. | IC 24-4.5-5-105; income withholding mechanics IC 31-16-15 |
| Iowa | 50% of disposable earnings | The Iowa rule ordinarily limits a single support withholding to 50% of nonexempt disposable income; multiple support orders can invoke the higher federal tiers. | Iowa Admin. Code r. 441-98.40; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Kansas | 50% of disposable earnings | Kansas caps the entire support withholding, including the fee and any medical-insurance premium, at 50% of disposable income. | K.S.A. 23-3104(f); 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Kentucky | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Kentucky excludes support orders from its ordinary 25% garnishment restriction, so the federal CCPA support tiers control this estimate. | KRS 427.010(3); 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Louisiana | 50% of disposable earnings | For child support, 50% of disposable earnings is exempt, so at most 50% is garnishable, at or below every federal CCPA tier. For spousal support alone the exemption is 60% (at most 40% garnishable). A mixed or unallocated child-plus-spousal order enforced by DCFS is treated entirely as child support. The federal CCPA tiers (15 U.S.C. 1673(b)) remain the outer ceiling. | La. R.S. 13:3881(A)(1) |
| Maine | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Maine states the same support-withholding tiers as the federal CCPA, based on another supported family and arrears age. | 14 M.R.S. § 3126-A; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Maryland | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Maryland support withholding follows the federal CCPA tiers (50/55/60/65 percent of disposable earnings) per Fam. Law § 10-122(c); there is no stricter state cap for support. Arrears portions are apportioned into the withholding at no less than $1 and no more than 25 percent of the current support payment (§ 10-122(b)(2)). The Com. Law § 15-601.1 exemption, the greater of 75 percent of disposable wages or 30 times the Maryland minimum hourly wage per week, applies to ordinary creditor attachments, not support. | Md. Code, Fam. Law § 10-122; Com. Law § 15-601.1 |
| Massachusetts | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Massachusetts income withholding is subject to the federal CCPA support ceiling. In covered IV-D arrears cases, the notice may increase withholding by 25%, but the total still cannot exceed the applicable 50%, 55%, 60%, or 65% federal tier. | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 119A, § 12; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Michigan | 50% of disposable earnings | Total income withheld under all support-related orders (current support, arrears, fees, health-care premiums) shall not exceed 50% of the payer disposable earnings, as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1672. | Mich. Comp. Laws 552.608 |
| Minnesota | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Support income withholding must not exceed the CCPA 15 U.S.C. 1673(b) maximum (50/55/60/65 percent of disposable earnings); no stricter Minnesota cap applies to support. 518A.53 subd. 10 adds withholding of 20 percent of the monthly obligation toward arrears, inside the same federal ceiling. The graduated 10/15/25 percent scale in 571.922 (post-2024 amendments) governs ordinary creditor levies, not support. | Minn. Stat. 518A.53; 571.922 |
| Mississippi | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Mississippi applies the federal CCPA support tiers: 50% or 60% of disposable earnings, increased to 55% or 65% for support more than 12 weeks overdue. A withholding order may add at least 15% of current support toward a delinquency, but total withholding cannot exceed the CCPA ceiling. | Miss. Code §§ 93-11-103(5), 85-3-4; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Missouri | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Missouri caps administrative withholding at the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act limit; the four support tiers depend on another supported family and arrears age. | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 454.505; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Montana | 50% of disposable earnings | Although §40-5-416 references the federal CCPA maximum, Montana CSSD states that its own orders are limited to 50% of disposable income; another agency’s order may reach the federal tier. | Mont. Code Ann. § 40-5-416; CSSD employer guidance |
| Nebraska | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Nebraska adopts the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act support tiers: 50% or 60%, increased by five percentage points when arrears exceed 12 weeks. | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-1722 |
| Nevada | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Nevada applies the NRS 31.295(4) support limits through NRS 31A.030(2): 50 percent of disposable earnings with another spouse or child to support, 60 percent without, and 55 or 65 percent for support at least 12 weeks overdue. These match the federal CCPA ceilings. | NRS 31A.030(2); NRS 31.295(4); 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| New Hampshire | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | New Hampshire support income assignment remains subject to the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65 percent ceilings. | RSA chapter 458-B; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| New Jersey | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | New Jersey support withholding follows the federal CCPA tiers (50/55/60/65 percent of disposable earnings): the state income withholding statutes cap the withholding total at the section 303(b) CCPA limits, and no stricter New Jersey cap applies to support. The exact New Jersey statutory subsection text was not fetchable from an official source (not yet confirmed against the official text); the percentages are corroborated by the federal statute itself and by New Jersey agency employer materials. The 10-percent-of-gross limit of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56 protects paychecks from ORDINARY creditor wage executions, not from support orders. | N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.8 et seq.; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| New Mexico | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | New Mexico requires immediate support withholding and applies federal withholding protections; our calculator uses the federal 50/55/60/65% disposable-earnings tiers. | NMSA 1978, § 40-4A-4.1; 8.50.110 NMAC |
| New York | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | CPLR 5241(g) mirrors the CCPA tiers: 50% if the debtor supports another spouse or child (55% if arrears exceed 12 weeks), 60% if not (65% with such arrears). CPLR 5242 income deduction orders parallel. | N.Y. CPLR 5241(g) |
| North Carolina | 40% for one order; 45% or 50% with multiple orders | Tiered caps: 40% of disposable income per pay period for a single withholding order; with multiple orders, 45% if the obligor supports a spouse or other dependent children and 50% if not. Alimony and postseparation-support withholding follow the CCPA limits instead (G.S. 110-136.6(b1)). | N.C. Gen. Stat. 110-136.6(b) |
| North Dakota | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | North Dakota support withholding is subject to the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65 percent ceilings. | N.D.C.C. ch. 14-09; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Ohio | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | ORC 3121.03 requires withholding up to the maximum permitted under section 303(b) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. 1673(b). No stricter Ohio cap identified. | Ohio Rev. Code 3121.03 |
| Oklahoma | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Oklahoma support orders use immediate income assignment; federal CCPA 50/55/60/65% disposable-earnings ceilings apply. | 43 O.S. § 115; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Oregon | 50% of disposable earnings | Oregon ordinarily caps support withholding at 50% of net disposable income; a court may order more after hearing, never above the federal CCPA ceiling. | ORS 25.414(8) |
| Pennsylvania | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | PA follows the CCPA maxima for support withholding; the exact subsection cite is not yet confirmed against the official text. PA generally bars wage garnishment for ordinary debts; support is a statutory exception. | 23 Pa.C.S. 4348; Pa.R.Civ.P. 1910.21 |
| Rhode Island | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Rhode Island applies the federal 50/55/60/65% disposable-earnings ceilings. Its arrears withholding increment remains subject to that aggregate federal maximum. | R.I. Gen. Laws § 15-16-5; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| South Carolina | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Current support plus arrears withholding may not exceed the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65% disposable-earnings ceilings. | S.C. Code § 63-17-1470; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| South Dakota | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | South Dakota withholding operates within the federal CCPA support limits. | SDCL § 25-7A-32; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Tennessee | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Tennessee income assignments remain subject to the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65% disposable-earnings ceilings. | Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-501; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Texas | 50% of disposable earnings | Maximum withholding for child support is 50% of the obligor disposable earnings, below the federal CCPA 55/60/65 tiers. | Tex. Fam. Code 158.009 |
| Utah | 50% of disposable earnings | The 50 percent cap is the Utah R. Civ. P. 64D writ-of-garnishment ceiling for support judgments, stricter than the CCPA 55/60/65 tiers. ORS administrative income withholding under Utah Code 26B-9-306 (formerly 62A-11-406) is capped instead at the full CCPA 15 U.S.C. 1673(b) maximum, including the employer processing fee, so an ORS withholding notice can lawfully exceed this writ ceiling. | Utah R. Civ. P. 64D(a); Utah Code 26B-9-306 |
| Vermont | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | The aggregate CCPA 50/55/60/65% ceiling applies. Additional arrears withholding ordinarily may not exceed 25% of the existing support obligation and remains inside the federal ceiling. | 15 V.S.A. §§ 785 and 789; 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
| Virginia | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Virginia support withholding caps mirror the federal CCPA tiers (50/55/60/65 percent of disposable earnings). The stricter Virginia cap based on 40 times the greater of the federal or Virginia minimum wage applies to ordinary creditor garnishment, not support. § 34-29 was amended in 2026; the support caps were unchanged, but subsection lettering is not yet confirmed against the official text. | Va. Code § 34-29(C) |
| Washington | 50% of disposable earnings | Washington holds support withholding to 50 percent of disposable earnings on both enforcement tracks: court-track wage assignments under RCW 26.18.090(2) and DCS administrative withholding under RCW 74.20A.090. That is stricter than the federal CCPA, whose 55, 60, and 65 percent tiers never apply to a Washington paycheck; the 50 percent state line is the ceiling in every scenario. RCW 26.18.110, which some sources cite for the cap, sets employer duties only and carries no percentage of its own. | RCW 26.18.090(2)-(3); RCW 74.20A.090 |
| West Virginia | 40% or 50%; 45% or 55% with arrears over 12 weeks | West Virginia limits ordinary support withholding to 40%/50%, rising to 45%/55% when part of the withholding is for arrears older than 12 weeks. These are stricter than the parallel federal tiers. | W. Va. Code § 48-14-408 |
| Wisconsin | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | Wisconsin applies the federal CCPA 50/55/60/65 percent limits shown on the income withholding notice. | Wis. Stat. § 767.75; 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b) |
| Wyoming | Federal tiers: 50% to 65% | The Wyoming notice must state that support withholding plus the authorized fee cannot exceed the federal maximum. | Wyo. Stat. § 20-6-210(b)(iii); 15 U.S.C. § 1673 |
Federal tiers mean 50% of disposable earnings if the parent supports another spouse or child, 60% if not, and 5 points more for arrears older than 12 weeks. The withholding order served on the employer controls the actual amount.
Garnishment limits FAQs
Which states limit child support garnishment below the federal cap?
13 jurisdictions do in at least some support cases: Arizona, California, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia. Several apply the lower limit only in certain proceedings, so check the state’s row in the table and its calculator page.
Can child support really take half my paycheck?
Up to half of disposable earnings, yes, and up to 65 percent in the worst federal tier. Some states stop lower, like North Carolina’s 40 percent single-order cap. The withholding order and your state’s cap control the exact figure.
Do my 401(k) and health insurance reduce the amount that can be garnished?
No. Disposable earnings subtracts only legally required deductions like taxes and Social Security. Voluntary deductions such as retirement deferrals, health premiums, and union dues do not shrink the base the percentage applies to.
What happens when the ordered support is more than the cap allows?
The employer withholds up to the cap and no more. The unpaid remainder still accrues as arrears against the parent; the cap limits collection from a paycheck, not the underlying obligation.
Are bonuses and severance subject to support withholding?
Generally yes. Federal guidance treats compensation for personal services broadly, including commissions and bonuses, and states routinely withhold from lump sums. Several states publish separate lump-sum reporting rules for employers.
Official sources
Official sources last verified: .
- 15 U.S.C. 1673 (CCPA garnishment limits: 50/55/60/65% for support)
U.S. Congress (text via Cornell LII mirror) Last checked
- DOL WHD Fact Sheet #30 (CCPA garnishment; rev. Dec. 2024)
U.S. Dept. of Labor WHD Last checked
- Tex. Fam. Code ch. 158 (158.009 withholding cap 50%)
Texas Legislature Last checked
- OAG "Wage Withholding" page (withholding mechanics; 80% of payments collected via withholding)
Texas OAG Last checked
- MCL 552.608 (50% withholding cap on disposable earnings)
Michigan Legislature Last checked
- Code Civ. Proc. 706.052 (support withholding: 50% default cap)
California Legislature Last checked
- G.S. 110-136.6 (withholding caps 40/45/50%)
NC General Assembly Last checked
- CPLR 5241 (income execution for support; 50/55/60/65% caps)
NY Senate Last checked
- Fla. Stat. 61.1301 (income deduction orders; CCPA limits + 20% delinquency add)
Florida Legislature (Online Sunshine, leg.state.fl.us) Last checked
- W. Va. Code § 48-14-408 — determination of amounts withheld
West Virginia Legislature Last checked
- Utah R. Civ. P. 64D (writ of garnishment; support judgments capped at 50 percent of disposable earnings, stricter than the CCPA tiers; eff. 2014-05-01)
Utah State Courts (utcourts.gov) Last checked
- ORS Child Support Public Policy CS 720P-2 "Income Withholding" (quotes Utah Code 26B-9-306: withholding capped at the CCPA 1673(b) maximum incl. payor fee)
Utah Office of Recovery Services (ORS) Last checked
- Iowa Administrative Code rule 441-98.40 — maximum support withholding
Iowa Legislature / Department of Health and Human Services Last checked
Reviewed by SupportDecode Editorial Team Page content reviewed Sources Methodology Update log
Run the numbers
Texas garnishment calculator
The flat 50 percent Texas cap against your disposable earnings.
Open the tool →North Carolina garnishment calculator
The strictest cap we cover: 40, 45, or 50 percent by order count and dependents.
Open the tool →Ohio garnishment calculator
The full federal 50/55/60/65 matrix as Ohio applies it.
Open the tool →
Changelog: page first published as part of the guides library. Material changes are dated in the update log.