Updated for 2026 guidelines

Child Support Calculator & 2026 State Guidelines

Estimate child support with your state 2026 formula. Every number links to an official source, and every page shows the date we last checked it.

Reviewed by SupportDecode Editorial Team Page content reviewed Sources Methodology Update log

Estimate your child support

Texas guidelines are shown here. 51 states now have their own calculators: choose yours from the map and table below for state-specific math, sources, and worked examples.

1/3Paying parent's income
How do you want to enter income?

Employee pay before taxes. The 2026 OAG employee tax chart converts this to net; self-employment income is not supported here, enter net resources instead.

2/3Children

Other children the paying parent has a legal duty to support (Sec. 154.129).

3/3Monthly deductions (optional)

Rare. Texas has no state income tax; fill this in only if another state taxes this income.

Estimated monthly child support: $839.83

The paying parent pays this amount to the receiving parent each month.

Assumptions

  • Guideline amount only; medical and dental support are ordered in addition (Sec. 154.064) and are not included.
  • Texas has no formulaic parenting-time (overnight) adjustment and no childcare add-on; deviations are discretionary under Sec. 154.123.
  • Gross-to-net conversion uses the 2026 OAG employed-persons tax chart parameters: OASDI 6.2%, Medicare 1.45%, federal income tax for a single person with the standard deduction. OASDI stops at the 2026 wage base of $184,500 a year, as the official chart does.

Continue with this income in the PayDecode take-home calculator

PayDecode is a separate site. The link may not carry your numbers over; if its form opens blank, enter the income there again.

Estimate only. The court or state agency calculation controls.

Texas guidelines, effective 2026-01-01.

How states calculate child support

Every state has a written formula, called a guideline. Courts start from the guideline number. They can move away from it, but they have to explain why.

States use one of three basic models. Across the 51 jurisdictions (50 states and DC), 39 use income shares, 7 use a percentage of income, and 3 use the Melson formula. California follows its own statewide formula, and the District of Columbia uses a hybrid of two approaches.

Income shares states add both parents’ incomes together. They look up the amount the guideline says the children need. Then they split that amount between the parents in proportion to income.

Percentage of income states apply a set percentage to the paying parent’s income. The percentage usually rises with the number of children. Some of these states look at net income, others at gross.

Melson formula states set aside a basic living amount for each parent first. Support comes out of what is left. Only a few states use this model.

Federal law requires every state to review its guideline at least once every four years. That is why numbers on this site carry effective dates and review dates.

Guideline review cycle
Every state must review its guideline at least every 4 yearssource
Federal withholding ceiling
50% to 65% of disposable earnings, depending on your situationsource
Interest on unpaid support
Charged in many states, at rates that differ by statesource

Child support rules by state

Switch between formula models and verification evidence, then select any state to see its rule summary, test evidence, and calculator. Every state remains available as a normal text link in the comparison table below the map.

Skip the map to the state table
Color map by:
Alaska: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedAlabama: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedArkansas: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedArizona: Income shares model; 6 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceCalifornia: Guideline formula (CA) model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedColorado: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedConnecticut: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedDelaware: Melson formula model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedFlorida: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedGeorgia: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedHawaii: Melson formula model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedIowa: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedIdaho: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedIllinois: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedIndiana: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedKansas: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedKentucky: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedLouisiana: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMassachusetts: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMaryland: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMaine: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMichigan: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMinnesota: Income shares model; 8 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceMissouri: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMississippi: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedMontana: Melson formula model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNorth Carolina: Income shares model; 10 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceNorth Dakota: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNebraska: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNew Hampshire: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNew Jersey: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNew Mexico: Income shares model; 9 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceNevada: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedNew York: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedOhio: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedOklahoma: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedOregon: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedPennsylvania: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedRhode Island: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedSouth Carolina: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedSouth Dakota: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedTennessee: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedTexas: Percentage of income model; 7 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceUtah: Income shares model; 9 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification toleranceVirginia: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedVermont: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedWashington: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedWisconsin: Percentage of income model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedWest Virginia: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedWyoming: Income shares model; Source-derived scenarios; no official-calculator match recordedDistrict of Columbia: Hybrid (DC) model; 9 of 10 scenarios match an official calculator within the published verification tolerance
Map shapes are simplified cartographic presentation geometry, not legal boundaries.
  • Income shares: 39 jurisdictions
  • Percentage of income: 7 jurisdictions
  • Melson formula: 3 jurisdictions
  • Guideline formula (CA): 1 jurisdiction
  • Hybrid (DC): 1 jurisdiction

Prefer the underlying data? Download the verification evidence as CSV. It is generated from the same registry that colors the map.

Why the calculator starts with your state

Child support guidelines are set at the state or District of Columbia level. A city or county can change where you file, which office keeps the payment ledger, and which local forms you use, but it does not create a separate city guideline formula. Start with the state connected to the order or case, then confirm local procedure with the court or child support agency.

  • Formula model

    Compare income-shares, percentage-of-income, Melson, California's statewide formula, and the District of Columbia hybrid.

    Compare all 51 jurisdictions →
  • Verification evidence

    See which test scenarios reproduce official calculators or published examples, and which ones still need an explicit official cross-check.

    Open verification details →
  • Rules beyond the base amount

    Parenting-time adjustments, high-income treatment, and arrears interest vary by state even when two states use the same headline model.

2026 child support rules and verification by state

The example column applies one standardized scenario to each state formula:2 children, one parent earning$60,000.00 and $40,000.00 a year gross, and 50/50 custody.

Child support guideline model, standardized example amount, and verification evidence for all 50 states and DC
State2026 modelStandardized example (monthly)Verification evidenceState page
AlabamaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
AlaskaPercentage of incomeSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
ArizonaIncome sharesSee state page6/10 match official calculators within the published verification tolerance1 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
ArkansasIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
CaliforniaGuideline formulaSee state pageCalifornia Fam. Code 4055 runs on net monthly disposable incomes (Fam. Code 4059); the data pack defines no gross-to-net conversion, so no honest estimate can be made from the scenario gross incomes.Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
ColoradoIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
ConnecticutIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
DelawareMelson formulaSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
District of ColumbiaHybridSee state page9/10 match official calculators within the published verification toleranceDetails
FloridaIncome sharesSee state pageFlorida guidelines run on statutory NET incomes (Fla. Stat. 61.30(3)-(5)); the data pack defines no gross-to-net conversion, so no honest estimate can be made from the scenario gross incomes.Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
GeorgiaIncome sharesSee state pageEngine declined to estimate: payerCourtOrderedDays must be between 0 and 182.5Source-derived scenarios9 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
HawaiiMelson formulaSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
IdahoIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
IllinoisIncome shares$279.67Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
IndianaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
IowaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
KansasIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
KentuckyIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
LouisianaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
MaineIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
MarylandIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
MassachusettsIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
MichiganIncome sharesSee state pageThe 2025 Michigan Child Support Formula runs on NET incomes (MCSF ch. 2); the data pack defines no gross-to-net conversion, so no honest estimate can be made from the scenario gross incomes.Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
MinnesotaIncome sharesSee state page8/10 match official calculators within the published verification tolerance2 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
MississippiPercentage of incomeSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
MissouriIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
MontanaMelson formulaSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
NebraskaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
NevadaPercentage of incomeSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
New HampshireIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
New JerseyIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
New MexicoIncome sharesSee state page9/10 match official calculators within the published verification toleranceDetails
New YorkPercentage of income$1,154.38Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
North CarolinaIncome shares$260.3810/10 match official calculators within the published verification toleranceDetails
North DakotaPercentage of incomeSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
OhioIncome shares$886.28Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
OklahomaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
OregonIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
PennsylvaniaIncome sharesSee state pagePennsylvania guidelines run on monthly NET incomes (Pa.R.Civ.P. 1910.16-2); the data pack defines no gross-to-net conversion, so no honest estimate can be made from the scenario gross incomes.Source-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
Rhode IslandIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
South CarolinaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
South DakotaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
TennesseeIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
TexasPercentage of income$1,049.797/10 match official calculators within the published verification tolerance3 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
UtahIncome sharesSee state page9/10 match official calculators within the published verification tolerance1 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
VermontIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
VirginiaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
WashingtonIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenarios10 still explicitly need an official cross-checkDetails
West VirginiaIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
WisconsinPercentage of incomeSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails
WyomingIncome sharesSee state pageSource-derived scenariosDetails

Model classifications for all 50 states and DC were reviewed against official sources. Detailed, source-backed calculator pages are available for all 51 jurisdictions. Where the example column says "See state page", that state formula needs inputs the standardized scenario does not define, so we do not guess a number. Each state page states its own verification status and limitations.

Deep-dive guides

Guides for more states are added as each state research pack passes review.

How to use this estimate

This tool applies your state’s published guideline formula to the numbers you enter. It is a starting point, not a court order. Judges can adjust the guideline amount for reasons the formula does not capture.

Your inputs stay in your browser. Nothing you type is sent to us or stored by us.

For state detail, open your state’s page. Each one explains the formula in plain English, shows a worked example, and links the official statute and the official state calculator where one exists.

What this estimate includes

  • Your state’s current guideline percentages or tables
  • State caps and low-income rules where they apply
  • Effective dates for every figure used

What it leaves out

  • Judge discretion and case-specific deviations
  • Retroactive support and past-due balances
  • Fees, interest, and enforcement actions

Official sources

Official sources last verified: .

Child support FAQs

How accurate is this calculator?

It follows each state’s published guideline formula and we test it against official worksheets and calculators. It is still an estimate. The court or state agency calculation controls, and judges can order a different amount than the guideline.

Which parent pays child support?

It depends on your state’s model and your custody arrangement. In many states the parent with less parenting time pays the other parent. In income shares states, both incomes shape the number. Your state page explains how your state decides.

Does 50/50 custody mean no child support?

Not automatically. Many states still order support in equal-time arrangements when one parent earns more. Some states have a specific offset formula for shared custody, and others leave it to the judge. Check your state page for the exact rule.

What income counts for child support?

Most states count wages, salaries, self-employment income, bonuses, and many benefits. States differ on items like overtime, gifts, and new-spouse income. Each state page lists what that state’s statute includes and excludes.

How often do child support guidelines change?

Federal rules require each state to review its guideline at least once every four years. Caps, tables, and percentages also change between reviews. We record the effective date for every figure and note when we last verified it.

Can child support be taken straight from a paycheck?

Yes. Income withholding is the standard collection method. Federal law caps withholding at 50 to 65 percent of disposable earnings depending on your situation, and some states set lower caps. Our garnishment tool covers the limits.

Does unpaid child support grow with interest?

In many states, yes. Rates and compounding rules differ widely by state, and some states charge no interest at all. Our arrears tool applies your state’s rate and cites the statute behind it.

Is this legal advice?

No. This site provides estimates and citations to official sources. It does not give legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. A family law attorney or your state’s child support agency can advise on your specific case.

Put this table on your site

Publishers may embed the free state guidelines table on their own site, with visible SupportDecode attribution. Get the embed snippet.